{"componentChunkName":"component---src-pages-sips-sip-markdown-remark-frontmatter-sip-tsx","path":"/sips/sip-185/","result":{"data":{"markdownRemark":{"fileAbsolutePath":"/vercel/path0/content/sips/sip-185.md","frontmatter":{"sip":185,"sccp":null,"title":"Debt Shares","network":"Ethereum & Optimism","author":"Jackson Chan (@jacko125)","type":"Governance","proposal":"https://snapshot.org/#/snxgov.eth/proposal/QmXqY1eo3kfnEyNMSimtnxSYEThra2AeKCsA37aQz5YqPK","implementor":null,"release":"Alphard","created":"2021-09-28T00:00:00.000Z","updated":null,"status":"Implemented"},"html":"<!--You can leave these HTML comments in your merged SIP and delete the visible duplicate text guides, they will not appear and may be helpful to refer to if you edit it again. This is the suggested template for new SIPs. Note that an SIP number will be assigned by an editor. When opening a pull request to submit your SIP, please use an abbreviated title in the filename, `sip-draft_title_abbrev.md`. The title should be 44 characters or less.-->\n<h2 id=\"simple-summary\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#simple-summary\" aria-label=\"simple summary permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Simple Summary</h2>\n<!--\"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.\" Simply describe the outcome the proposed changes intends to achieve. This should be non-technical and accessible to a casual community member.-->\n<p>Track staker’s issued debt amount by issuing debt shares when minting or burning sUSD debt.</p>\n<h2 id=\"abstract\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#abstract\" aria-label=\"abstract permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Abstract</h2>\n<!--A short (~200 word) description of the proposed change, the abstract should clearly describe the proposed change. This is what *will* be done if the SIP is implemented, not *why* it should be done or *how* it will be done. If the SIP proposes deploying a new contract, write, \"we propose to deploy a new contract that will do x\".-->\n<p>This SIP proposes the implementation of a debt shares token mechanism that allows the percentage of a staker’s debt to be calculated based on their number of shares. A staker’s percentage of the debt pool is their balance of debt shares divided by the total supply of all outstanding debt shares. Minting and burning sUSD debt updates the balance of debt shares issued.</p>\n<h2 id=\"motivation\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#motivation\" aria-label=\"motivation permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Motivation</h2>\n<!--This is the problem statement. This is the *why* of the SIP. It should clearly explain *why* the current state of the protocol is inadequate.  It is critical that you explain *why* the change is needed, if the SIP proposes changing how something is calculated, you must address *why* the current calculation is innaccurate or wrong. This is not the place to describe how the SIP will address the issue!-->\n<p>Issuing sUSD debt on Synthetix exposes stakers to fluctuations in the debt pool when synths are exchanged. In order to accurately track the debt owed by a staker, we need to track the percentage of the debt pool each staker has minted using the debt ledger. The debt shares mechanism will replace the debt ledger by issuing or burning a number of share tokens when sUSD is minted or burned and a staker’s debt percentage would be their balance of tokens divided by the total supply of debt shares. Using debt shares instead of the debt ledger mechanism also enables fees and rewards to be distributed using the staking rewards model where rewards are earned based on the staker’s balance of debt shares.</p>\n<p>In order to support migration of the debt pool to L2, the debt shares will allow the migration of staker’s debt across to L2 by transferring their balance of shares to L2 and vice versa.</p>\n<h2 id=\"specification\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#specification\" aria-label=\"specification permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Specification</h2>\n<!--The specification should describe the syntax and semantics of any new feature, there are five sections\n1. Overview\n2. Rationale\n3. Technical Specification\n4. Test Cases\n5. Configurable Values\n-->\n<h3 id=\"overview\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#overview\" aria-label=\"overview permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Overview</h3>\n<!--This is a high level overview of *how* the SIP will solve the problem. The overview should clearly describe how the new feature will be implemented.-->\n<p>When issuing sUSD, the amount of debt shares issued is based on the amount of sUSD being minted. The debt shares represent the percentage of the debt pool they will owe after minting. The price of each debt share is calculated based on the total supply of sUSD issued by all stakers and the current debt pool size. Debt shares enables L1 debt and staked SNX to migrate to L2 by sharing a combined debt shares supply.</p>\n<p>Example:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Alice mints 100 sUSD, gets issued with 100 debt shares</li>\n<li>Bob mints 100 sUSD, gets issued with 100 debt shares</li>\n<li>Both Alice and Bob each have 50% of the debt shares (100 / 200 shares)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>When the total debt pool value fluctuates, the shares will be used to calculate how much debt the minter owes. For example, if the debt pool now doubles to 400 sUSD, based on the above scenario:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Alice who has 50% (100 shares), will have 200 sUSD debt</li>\n<li>Alice who has 50% (100 shares), will have 200 sUSD debt</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Burning sUSD reduces the number of debt shares issued against a staker and the number of shares burnt is calculated with the total debt pool value. Continuing with the example above,</p>\n<p>Example:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Alice now burns 100 sUSD, which burns (100 / 400) * 200 shares = 50 shares</li>\n<li>Alice would have 50 shares after her burn, ⅓ of the debt pool.</li>\n<li>Alice’s remaining debt will be (50 / 150 shares) * 300 = 100 sUSD</li>\n</ul>\n<h3 id=\"rationale\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#rationale\" aria-label=\"rationale permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Rationale</h3>\n<!--This is where you explain the reasoning behind how you propose to solve the problem. Why did you propose to implement the change in this way, what were the considerations and trade-offs. The rationale fleshes out what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work. The rationale may also provide evidence of consensus within the community, and should discuss important objections or concerns raised during discussion.-->\n<p>This mechanism has several major improvements and benefits:</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Provides a way to track staker’s debt using a token standard / mechanism.</li>\n<li>Simplifies the debt ledger by using a balance and total supply of debt shares issued.</li>\n<li>Enables staking rewards to be distributed fairly using the StakingRewards contract that is ERC20 token based.</li>\n<li>Prevents fee period snapshotting exploits as rewards can be fairly distributed based on staker’s debt shares.</li>\n<li>Enables migration of stakers debt from L1 -> L2 and bridging the SNX staked + debt in one transaction.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3 id=\"technical-specification\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#technical-specification\" aria-label=\"technical specification permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Technical Specification</h3>\n<!--The technical specification should outline the public API of the changes proposed. That is, changes to any of the interfaces Synthetix currently exposes or the creations of new ones.-->\n<p>The debt shares issued and burned when minting sUSD or burning sUSD is calculated based on the formula:</p>\n<p>\\( shares = total shares * \\frac{sUSD amount}{total debt pool}\\)</p>\n<p>where total debt pool is the sUSD value of the debt pool calculated when the staker is minting or burning to issue or burn the right number of shares.</p>\n<p>Different scenarios of minting and burning sUSD and the debt shares issued is covered in this <a href=\"https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mRubzRUhIR0-OTIrj64rq5bJPOaLfZbV6aiCl5LG8VU/edit?usp=sharing\">sheet</a></p>\n<p>To calculate the debt percentage of a staker and their sUSD debt owed would be simple as:</p>\n<p>\\(debt percentage = \\frac{balance (user)}{total supply (debt shares)}\\)</p>\n<p>This avoids the need to calculate the debt percentage of each staker and storing the debt percentage number in the debt ledger.</p>\n<p>The amount of sUSD debt can be calculated as <code>debt percentage * total debt pool</code>.</p>\n<h4 id=\"feepool-and-rewards\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#feepool-and-rewards\" aria-label=\"feepool and rewards permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>FeePool and rewards</h4>\n<p><em>Phase 1 Fee Pool upgrades</em></p>\n<p>Currently the <code>FeePoolState</code> stores the staker's issuance record on minting and burning. The debt shares will be used to record the staker's balance of shares after minting or burning and when the <code>FeePool.closePeriod()</code> is executed, it will store the total supply of debt shares. Using the balance of shares for each staker, they can claim their proportion of the sUSD and SNX rewards for the fee period as is.</p>\n<p>The debt ledger will be deprecated and the issuer will append the issuance data to the Fee Pool based on the debt shares contract.</p>\n<h4 id=\"migration-to-debt-shares\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#migration-to-debt-shares\" aria-label=\"migration to debt shares permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Migration to Debt Shares</h4>\n<p>On L1, there are currently 7000-8000 active stakers who's debt shares will be imported into the new Debt Share contract. The <code>Total Supply</code> of the debt shares to be minted will be <code>1,000,000</code> debt shares and the number of shares minted for each staker is based on their current debt percentage read from the debt ledger contract. The precision of the debt shares will be 18 decimal places.</p>\n<p>For example, a staker with a debt percentage of 10% would be minted <code>1,000,000 * 10% = 100,000</code> shares to represent their share of the debt pool. All stakers' debt shares will be calculated before the initial minting of their debt shares.</p>\n<p>The estimated transaction costs of the migration is 6M gas per 1000 addresses imported into the debt shares contract.</p>\n<p>An example of the Debt Shares contract with the import function</p>\n<pre><code>contract DebtShares {\n\n    uint256 public totalSupply;\n    mapping(address => uint256) public balances;\n\n    function importAddresses(address[] calldata accounts, uint256[] calldata amounts) public onlyOwner onlySetup virtual {\n        for (uint i = 0; i &#x3C; accounts.length; i++) {\n            mint(accounts[i], amounts[i]);\n        }\n    }\n\n    function mint(address account, uint256 amount) public virtual {\n        require(account != address(0), \"ERC20: mint to the zero address\");\n        totalSupply += amount;\n        balances[account] += amount;\n        emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount);\n}\n\n    event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value);\n}\n</code></pre>\n<h3 id=\"test-cases\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#test-cases\" aria-label=\"test cases permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Test Cases</h3>\n<!--Test cases for an implementation are mandatory for SIPs but can be included with the implementation..-->\n<h3 id=\"configurable-values-via-sccp\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#configurable-values-via-sccp\" aria-label=\"configurable values via sccp permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Configurable Values (Via SCCP)</h3>\n<!--Please list all values configurable via SCCP under this implementation.-->\n<h2 id=\"copyright\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#copyright\" aria-label=\"copyright permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Copyright</h2>\n<p>Copyright and related rights waived via <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/\">CC0</a>.</p>"}},"pageContext":{"id":"764eb415-2513-5112-8f47-3e15d9659772","frontmatter__sip":185,"__params":{"frontmatter__sip":"185"}}},"staticQueryHashes":[]}