{"componentChunkName":"component---src-pages-sips-sip-markdown-remark-frontmatter-sip-tsx","path":"/sips/sip-352/","result":{"data":{"markdownRemark":{"fileAbsolutePath":"/vercel/path0/content/sips/sip-352.md","frontmatter":{"sip":352,"sccp":null,"title":"Deploy SNX token as xERC20 for crosschain bridging","network":"Ethereum & Base","author":"GUNBOATs (@gunboatsss), Max Lomusico","type":"Governance","proposal":null,"implementor":null,"release":null,"created":"2023-12-08T00:00:00.000Z","updated":null,"status":"Rejected"},"html":"<!--You can leave these HTML comments in your merged SIP and delete the visible duplicate text guides, they will not appear and may be helpful to refer to if you edit it again. This is the suggested template for new SIPs. Note that an SIP number will be assigned by an editor. When opening a pull request to submit your SIP, please use an abbreviated title in the filename, `sip-draft_title_abbrev.md`. The title should be 44 characters or less.-->\n<h2 id=\"simple-summary\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#simple-summary\" aria-label=\"simple summary permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Simple Summary</h2>\n<!--\"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.\" Simply describe the outcome the proposed changes intends to achieve. This should be non-technical and accessible to a casual community member.-->\n<p>Deploy SNX xERC20 and Lockbox to facilitate bridging between Ethereum and Base and allow for additional fast bridge solutions while retaining sovereignity.</p>\n<h2 id=\"abstract\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#abstract\" aria-label=\"abstract permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Abstract</h2>\n<!--A short (~200 word) description of the proposed change, the abstract should clearly describe the proposed change. This is what *will* be done if the SIP is implemented, not *why* it should be done or *how* it will be done. If the SIP proposes deploying a new contract, write, \"we propose to deploy a new contract that will do x\".-->\n<p>This propsal aims to implements <a href=\"https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/erc-7281-sovereign-bridged-tokens/14979\">ERC-7281</a>, as known as the xERC20 standard, by deploying xERC-20 SNX on Ethereum and Base with SNX Lockbox on Ethereum.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.xerc20.com/\">xERC20</a> tokens are ERC-20 tokens which can be transferred with no slippage across chains without compromising on security.</p>\n<p><strong>Contrary to other proprietary crosschain standards, token issuers always retain control and sovereignty over their tokens</strong>\nThis ability will allow Synthetix to whitelist specific bridges, giving them the rights to mint same representation of crosschain token. This allows for fine-grained control over minting/burning limits for each bridge. Limit potential damage should a security breaches happens.</p>\n<h2 id=\"motivation\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#motivation\" aria-label=\"motivation permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Motivation</h2>\n<!--This is the problem statement. This is the *why* of the SIP. It should clearly explain *why* the current state of the protocol is inadequate.  It is critical that you explain *why* the change is needed, if the SIP proposes changing how something is calculated, you must address *why* the current calculation is inaccurate or wrong. This is not the place to describe how the SIP will address the issue!-->\n<p>As SIP-350 and SIP-351 compete to provide fast bridging solutions for SNX, while improving user experience on waiting times, has created vendor lock-in. With many such cases from bridge imploding like <a href=\"https://cointelegraph.com/news/multichain-victims-search-for-answers-in-billion-dollar-exploit-as-new-evidence-emerges\">Multichain</a>. Recovering from those problems takes time and requires integration to redeploy everything which isn't ideal. By setting up xERC-20, Synthetix can add or remove bridges with canonical fallback while retaining same integration and liquidity,</p>\n<h2 id=\"specification\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#specification\" aria-label=\"specification permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Specification</h2>\n<!--The specification should describe the syntax and semantics of any new feature, there are five sections\n1. Overview\n2. Rationale\n3. Technical Specification\n4. Test Cases\n5. Configurable Values\n-->\n<h3 id=\"overview\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#overview\" aria-label=\"overview permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Overview</h3>\n<!--This is a high level overview of *how* the SIP will solve the problem. The overview should clearly describe how the new feature will be implemented.-->\n<p>The deployment on Ethereum consists of:\nxERC-20 token - <a href=\"https://github.com/defi-wonderland/xERC20\">Factory Repo</a>\nLockbox\nAnd the deployment on Base only needs to have xERC-20 token deployed on the rollup.\nThis is to conform SNX into the burn-and-mint model for bridging.\nThe specification for Lockbox is an ERC-20 wrapper inspired by WETH.\nThe important part for xERC-20 is the bridge parameter and mint.burn function, controlled by governance and mint and burn function, only callable by Lockbox and bridges.</p>\n<pre><code class=\"language-solidity\">   /**\n   * @notice Updates the limits of any bridge\n   * @dev Can only be called by the owner\n   * @param _mintingLimit The updated minting limit we are setting to the bridge\n   * @param _burningLimit The updated burning limit we are setting to the bridge\n   * @param _bridge The address of the bridge we are setting the limits too\n   */\n   function setLimits(address _bridge, uint256 _mintingLimit, uint256 _burningLimit) external;\n\n   /**\n   * @notice Mints tokens for a user\n   * @dev Can only be called by a minter\n   * @param _user The address of the user who needs tokens minted\n   * @param _amount The amount of tokens being minted\n   */\n   function mint(address _user, uint256 _amount) external;\n\n   /**\n   * @notice Burns tokens for a user\n   * @dev Can only be called by a minter\n   * @param _user The address of the user who needs tokens burned\n   * @param _amount The amount of tokens being burned\n   */\n   function burn(address _user, uint256 _amount) external;\n</code></pre>\n<p>The flow of bridging from Ethereum => Base is:</p>\n<ol>\n<li>The user deposits tokens into Lockbox and mint xERC-20.</li>\n<li>Bridge burns user's xERC-20 on Ethereum.</li>\n<li>Bridge mints xERC-20 token on Base and credit to the user.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>The flow of bridging from Base => Ethereum is:</p>\n<ol>\n<li>Bridge burns user's xERC-20 on Base.</li>\n<li>Bridge mints xERC-20 on Ethereum and credit to the user.</li>\n<li>Users withdraw ERC-20 from the lockbox.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Importantly, all these steps can be abstracted from the user.</p>\n<h3 id=\"rationale\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#rationale\" aria-label=\"rationale permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Rationale</h3>\n<!--This is where you explain the reasoning behind how you propose to solve the problem. Why did you propose to implement the change in this way, what were the considerations and trade-offs. The rationale fleshes out what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work. The rationale may also provide evidence of consensus within the community, and should discuss important objections or concerns raised during discussion.-->\n<h4 id=\"benefits\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#benefits\" aria-label=\"benefits permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Benefits</h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Capital efficiency:</li>\n</ul>\n<p>enables 0 slippage crosschain movements without any requirement to bootstrap liquidity in advance. No AMMs are required at all.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Independence and Flexibility:</li>\n</ul>\n<p>xERC20 is a bridge-agnostic open standard, providing token issuers the ability to retain control and sovereignty over their tokens, and the flexibility to use multiple bridges at the same time</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Granular security control</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Security can be isolated per chain, per bridge and minting limits. Since the limits are enforced in the token contracts, you can effectively set per-chain limits as well, simply by having different limits for each bridge on each chain.\nThe ability to add 3rd party bridges in the whitelist allows users to move tokens out of L2s without using the native bridges, providing a fast experience.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>Faster deployment, enhanced functionalities</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Using the xERC20 would allow the DAO to easily and more cost-effectively deploy and launch to 1000 rollups with a simplified process, and enable additional functionalities like crosschain staking.</p>\n<h4 id=\"risks\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#risks\" aria-label=\"risks permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Risks</h4>\n<p>xERC-20 smart contracts have been tested and audited; as every smart contract they might be subject to vulnerabilities. However, we believe the risk is low as the standard is a light extension to the ERC-20 interface, and is already used in production by several projects.</p>\n<p>What impacts the risk curve are the bridges that get whitelisted.</p>\n<ul>\n<li>If the Synthetix DAO decides to only whitelist native bridges, this would effectively have the same trust assumptions as bridging a token to the L2.</li>\n<li>If the DAO decides to whitelist other 3rd party bridges, this increases the risk for SNX. The xERC20 standard doesn’t enhance the security of the single bridge, but it allows to clearly confine the risk exposure for each bridging provider.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Example of deployed xERC20 token:</p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https://docs.beefy.finance/ecosystem/bifi-token/token-bridge\">Beefy mooBIFI</a> is deployed with canonical bridge, Axlar, LayerZero and Chainlink's CCIP.</li>\n<li>Alchemix has whitelisted Connext and the native bridge.</li>\n</ul>\n<h3 id=\"technical-specification\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#technical-specification\" aria-label=\"technical specification permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Technical Specification</h3>\n<!--The technical specification should outline the public API of the changes proposed. That is, changes to any of the interfaces Synthetix currently exposes or the creations of new ones.-->\n<p>As a extension of ERC-20, token user can used it like any other token.\nFor bridge aggreagtor, it will have to aware of each bridge limit from function defined within xERC20.\nFor the bridge, it will have to call <code>mint</code>/<code>burn</code> function of xERC20.</p>\n<h3 id=\"test-cases\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#test-cases\" aria-label=\"test cases permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Test Cases</h3>\n<!--Test cases for an implementation are mandatory for SIPs but can be included with the implementation..-->\n<p>N/A</p>\n<h3 id=\"configurable-values-via-sccp\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#configurable-values-via-sccp\" aria-label=\"configurable values via sccp permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Configurable Values (Via SCCP)</h3>\n<!--Please list all values configurable via SCCP under this implementation.-->\n<p>N/A</p>\n<h2 id=\"copyright\" style=\"position:relative;\"><a href=\"#copyright\" aria-label=\"copyright permalink\" class=\"anchor before\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"16\" version=\"1.1\" viewBox=\"0 0 16 16\" width=\"16\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M4 9h1v1H4c-1.5 0-3-1.69-3-3.5S2.55 3 4 3h4c1.45 0 3 1.69 3 3.5 0 1.41-.91 2.72-2 3.25V8.59c.58-.45 1-1.27 1-2.09C10 5.22 8.98 4 8 4H4c-.98 0-2 1.22-2 2.5S3 9 4 9zm9-3h-1v1h1c1 0 2 1.22 2 2.5S13.98 12 13 12H9c-.98 0-2-1.22-2-2.5 0-.83.42-1.64 1-2.09V6.25c-1.09.53-2 1.84-2 3.25C6 11.31 7.55 13 9 13h4c1.45 0 3-1.69 3-3.5S14.5 6 13 6z\"></path></svg></a>Copyright</h2>\n<p>Copyright and related rights waived via <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/\">CC0</a>.</p>"}},"pageContext":{"id":"bac463e3-aea1-55b2-9abe-fa75df9741fd","frontmatter__sip":352,"__params":{"frontmatter__sip":"352"}}},"staticQueryHashes":[]}